In the shadow of the two year anniversary of one of the worst mass shootings in American history, at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, CT, an extensive new study by two Vanderbilt University researchers challenges common assumptions about gun violence and mental illness that often emerge in the aftermath of mass shootings.
When a mass shooting occurs there seems to be a familiar narrative that untreated mental illness is the primary cause for the terrifying act.
For example, mainstream media was quick to diagnose Sandy Hook shooter Adam Lanza with schizophrenia, despite a lack of evidence for such claims (which would turn out to be untrue). In the aftermath of the shooting, conservative commentator Ann Coulter took this to an extreme, proclaiming, “Gun’s don’t kill people — mentally ill people do.”
But a new study published in the American Journal of Public Health finds that such an isolated focus on mental illness is not only misguided, but also harmful as it prevents us from seeking real solutions to the problem of gun violence.
“Gun discourse after mass shootings often perpetuates the fear that ‘some crazy person is going to come shoot me,'” said Dr. Jonathan Metzl, the study’s lead author. “But if you look at the research, it’s not the ‘crazy’ person you have to fear.”
The mythology of mental illness and violence
In the article, “Mental Illness, Mass Shootings and the Politics of American Firearms,” Metzl, along with fellow Vanderbilt researcher Kenneth MacLeish, analyzed data and literature linking guns and mental illness over the past 40 years. They found that despite societal pre-conceived notions, most mentally ill people are not violent.
“Fewer than 5 percent of the 120,000 gun-related killings in the United States between 2001 and 2010 were perpetrated by people diagnosed with mental illness,” they write.
Their research uncovered four central myths that arise in the aftermath of mass shootings:
- Mental illness causes gun violence
- Psychiatric diagnosis can predict gun crime before it happens
- U.S. mass-shootings “prove” that we should fear mentally ill loners
- Because of the complex psychiatric histories of mass-shooters, gun control “won’t prevent” mass shootings
They stress that all four of these are incorrect, though common assumptions.
What’s more, the researchers also found that “across the board the mentally ill are 60 to 120 percent more likely than the average person to be the victims of violent crime rather than the perpetrators.”
Metzl and MacLeish find that the focus on mental illness after horrific, yet statistically rare, mass shootings misdirects people from the bigger issues tied to preventing gun deaths in the U.S.
“There are 32,000 gun deaths in the United States on average every year and people are far more likely to be shot by relatives, friends or acquaintances than they are by lone violent psychopaths,” said Metzl.
“We should set our attention and gun policies on the everyday shootings, not on the sensational shootings because there we will get much more traction in preventing gun crime.”
The presumed link between mental illness and gun violence has led to calls for mental health screening for gun owners. But the authors find that psychiatric diagnosis is in and of itself not predictive of violence.
“Even the overwhelming majority of psychiatric patients who fit the profile of recent U.S. mass shooters — gun-owning, angry, paranoid white men — do not commit crimes,” Metzl and MacLeish write.
“Basing gun crime-prevention efforts on the mental health histories of mass shooters risks building ‘common evidence’ from ‘uncommon things,’ all while giving mental health providers the untenable responsibility of preventing the next massacre.”
Risk factors for gun violence
In the article, the authors detail how focusing solely on mental illness ignores those factors that do predict gun violence more broadly:
- Drug and alcohol use
- History of violence
- Access to firearms
- Personal relationship stress
“People are far more likely to be shot by relatives, friends, enemies or acquaintances than they are by lone violent psychopaths,” according to Metzl and MacLeish’s research.
Race, gender and gun anxiety
The authors also delve into to the ways that responses to mass shootings reflect cultural anxieties about race and gender.
“The rhetoric in which people are accumulating guns in the present day has a lot to do with the fear of the unknown stranger. ‘Somebody could come attack me or my family, so we need to protect ourselves.’ And that rhetoric is most common among suburban white men,” said Metzl.
The authors uncover how the political and racial strife in the 1960’s led some African Americans to push for their constitutional right to own and carry guns, while some white Americans at the time, including the National Rifle Association, pushed for stricter gun control laws.
“Reading the gun rights statements of the Black Panthers and other black power groups in the 1960’s is almost exactly the same as the Tea Party today,” said Metzl. “Both groups argued that they’re protecting themselves from government tyranny and have a constitutional right as individuals to bear arms,” said Metzl.
Yet Metzl adds that in the 60s, American society rushed to pathologize “black culture” while restricting gun rights, while in the present day our narratives restricts the problem to individual white brains while at the same time encouraging further gun ownership among.
- More Evidence That Mental Health Patients Are More Likely To Be Victims Than Perpetrators Of Violence — So Why Do We Keep Stigmatizing Mental Illness As A Cause Of Gun Violence?
- Gun Violence Prevention Requires Public Health Approach, Experts Say
- New Analysis Of Mass Shootings Find Striking Connection To Domestic Violence